Climate Scientists Lament a Nation Stuck on the Wrong Debate

Posted on by Patrick Sudlow

Even here in the UK, Central Government and Local Government are not taking climate change seriously.  In particularly here in Manchester, the Council is still allowing developers to build properties which are not energy efficient, do not harvest rainwater or recycle grey-water and make no use of renewable power.  Nor do they incorporate district heating into any of their developments.  They only need to look across the channel to see what can be done.  This article from Truthout makes the point that not enough is being done.

 

Climate Scientists Lament a Nation Stuck on the Wrong Debate.

Oil- The Next Revolution.pdf (application/pdf Object)

Posted on by Patrick Sudlow

Just what we need, someone to produce a report suggesting there is plenty more oil.  The problem is, we are too dependant of fossil fuels and we should be moving away from there use.  But a report like this, will simply put politicians minds at rest.  They will ignore climate change and continue with ‘business-as-usual’, even though it is not sustainable.  They will continue thinking some technology will come along and save the day.

But, I think all revealed in the forward, why this report was produced.  BP provided the funding for it, so was the author of this report being objective or subservient to his paymaster?

Oil- The Next Revolution.pdf (application/pdf Object).

guttae: TRADITION AND CHANGE IN POST-REGENERATION MANCHESTER

Posted on by Patrick Sudlow

A  blog which reflects my own opinions about the (de)regeneration of Manchester.  And how it has achieved nothing but put money into property developers hands.  All history of Manchester is slowly being erased, with Ancoats Infirmary to be demolished.  The blog is quite lengthy but worth a read.

guttae: TRADITION AND CHANGE IN POST-REGENERATION MANCHESTER.

Commission Rejects UK Application to Delay Compliance With Nitrogen Dioxide Laws in 12… — LONDON, June 28, 2012 /PRNewswire/ —

Posted on by Patrick Sudlow

As part of my objection to MMU’s plans for Birley Fields campus.  I raised the matter of air pollution and how the development, especially the stopping up of certain roads, would increase to poor quality in Hulme.  I especially emphasised that it would have a detrimental affect of the pupils of St. Philips Primary School.  I also criticised their traffic, air and noise assessment as not being adequate or of being representative of the actual conditions.

The local councillors, including the councillor for the Environment, the Planning Officer and Planning Committee, ignored such concerns.  If fact, the Planning Committee never conducted a site visit, even though this is a major development.  Hulme already suffers from a high rate of ill-health, mental and physical.

No one in Government, National and Local are taking this situation seriously.  In fact at a recent council meeting, it was stated that the emissions from Manchester Airport, do not fall on Manchester but the North Atlantic?  And the National Government does not want to comply with any EU regulations, because they say they are bad for big business?

Commission Rejects UK Application to Delay Compliance With Nitrogen Dioxide Laws in 12… — LONDON, June 28, 2012 /PRNewswire/ —.

Can renewables save the day?

Posted on by Patrick Sudlow

I agree with most of what she says, the UK has not done enough to stop us having an energy crisis in the coming years.  But, I disagree about the need for nuclear, it has been the nuclear industry which has attracted investment where as renewables have received a pittance.  Even Stern in his report, stated that it would take to long to get new nuclear built to prevent irreversible climate change and an energy crisis.

Can renewables save the day?.

Thoughts on why environmental groups failed to engage with a wider audience?

Posted on by Patrick Sudlow

I was asked to do a post on why environmental groups which are predominately white middle-class, do not attract more of the working-class?  This is only some thoughts I had whilst doing some gardening and is not intended to answer the question at this present time.

The middle-class environmental activists dismiss the working-class (social & council housing tenants), as not caring about the environmental, even to the extent of scorning them.

They should stop to think, who is causing the most environmental damage?  The working-class or the business and political classes?  Who has failed the World most, the poor or rich?

The working-class are bombarded by advertising TV programmes and films showing how well off everyone else is.  So they aspire to this, this of course the point of advertising and the consumer oriented media.  These are the people who can least afford the things advertised, but they feel they have failed, if they do not have the things it would appear everyone else has.

So instead of telling those with the least, that they should do more, the environmentalist should be getting the message across to businesses and politicians, that they have to change.  The way to try and change the ‘working-class’ altitude ( as well as banning advertising), is to educate the children in how to live more environmentally friendly.  Such as schemes promoted by the Soil Association, which is the Food for Life Partnership.  To empower the working-class by actually involving them with the decision making at the start of any project being proposed.

Introducing ‘The Doughnut’ of social and planetary boundaries for development – YouTube

Posted on by Patrick Sudlow

 

An interesting video from Oxfam, describing the concepts of  ”The Doughnut’ theory of planetary and social boundaries within which we humans can thrive safely.

Introducing ‘The Doughnut’ of social and planetary boundaries for development – YouTube.

There is also a paper on the subject available: A Safe and Just Space for Humanity

And she has a blog on the subject and is keen for people to become involved: Kate Raworth

Severn Suzuki Unifies World Vision for Sustainable Future at Rio+Social – YouTube

Posted on by Patrick Sudlow

The 6 minute speech given by Severn Suzuki, who spoke at the 1992 Rio Summit at 12 years old.  The speech was a written from contributors from all over the Globe.

Severn Suzuki Unifies World Vision for Sustainable Future at Rio+Social – YouTube.

UN Live United Nations Webcast – – Sustainable development for fighting poverty – Sustainable Development Dialogues, Rio+20

Posted on by Patrick Sudlow

A web-cast from Rio+ about sustainability, most of the others available so far are about corporates.  As well as the young female who silenced the World when she gave a speech 20 years ago being present.  A Mr Supe was on the panel and his message was, ‘Small farm, Small farm, Small farm.  He pointed out that $275 Billion of subsidies went into fertilisers and pesticides.  While a couple of reports one by Julius Protina and another by the FAO, highlighted how sustainable farming practices using old methods were more productive than intensive farming.  And it was through assisting these small farmers  not corporations was the only way ahead.  His comments come about 50 minutes in.

UN Live United Nations Webcast – – Sustainable development for fighting poverty – Sustainable Development Dialogues, Rio+20.